🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.